Statistical guidelines
- Indicate the analytical tests used in combination with all appropriate parameters: e.g., suggest and deviation that is standardSD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years).
- Use mean and deviation that is standard report usually distributed information.
- Utilize median and interpercentile range to report skewed information.
- For figures, utilize two digits that are significant more accuracy is essential (2.08, maybe maybe maybe not 2.07856444).
- Never ever utilize percentages for extremely little examples e.g., “one away from two” shouldn’t be changed by 50%.
But, understand that many journals provide chance of including materials that are supporting therefore make use of them easily for information of additional value. In this manner, never make an effort to “hide” information into the hope of saving it for the paper that is later. You may lose proof to strengthen your summary. If information are way too abundant, you can make use of those materials that are supplementary.
Utilize sub-headings to help keep outcomes of the type that is same, that will be more straightforward to review and read. Quantity these sub-sections when it comes to ease of interior cross-referencing, but constantly taking into consideration the publisher’s Guide for Authors.
For the data, choose a rational order that tells a definite tale and helps it be and simple to comprehend. Generally speaking, this is within the order that is same presented in the techniques area.
A significant issue is that you should not add recommendations in this section; you might be presenting your outcomes, and top article that means you cannot make reference to other people right here. In the event that you relate to other people, is really because you might be speaking about your outcomes, and also this needs to be within the Discussion area.divider|Because you might be speaking about your outcomes, and also this should be within the Discussion part.divider in the event that you make reference to other people, is
Write the Discussion
Right right Here you need to answer exactly exactly what the outcomes mean. Most likely it’s the easiest area to create, nevertheless the most difficult area getting appropriate. This is basically because it’s the many crucial part of your article. right right Here you receive the chance to offer your computer data. Remember that an enormous variety of manuscripts are refused since the Discussion is weak.
You need to result in the Discussion corresponding towards the outcomes, but don’t reiterate the outcome. Right right Here you ought to compare the published outcomes by the peers with yours (using a number of the sources contained in the Introduction). Never ever ignore work in disagreement with yours, in change, you need to confront it and persuade your reader that you’re proper or better.
Look at the following tips:
1. Avoid statements that exceed exactly what the total outcomes can help.
2. Avoid expressions that are unspecific as “higher temperature”, “at a diminished rate”, “highly significant”. Quantitative information are often preferred (35єC, 0.5%, p Minimize individual communications, usually do not consist of unpublished findings, manuscripts submitted although not yet accepted for book, magazines that aren’t peer evaluated, grey literature, or articles perhaps maybe not published in English.
When I have actually mentioned, you’ll find the essential respected information for every journal’s policy on citations whenever you consult the log’s Guide for Authors. Generally speaking, you ought to minmise communications that are personal and get mindful on how you consist of unpublished findings. These will likely to be needed for some procedures, but think about if they strengthen or weaken your paper. You might additionally start thinking about articles posted on research systems just before book, but consider balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. Whenever research that is citing languages except that English, be familiar with the chance that not everybody when you look at the review procedure will talk the language associated with the cited paper and therefore it might be useful to locate an interpretation where feasible.
You should use any computer software, such as for example EndNote or Mendeley, to format and can include your recommendations when you look at the paper. Most journals have finally the chance to files that are download small the structure associated with the recommendations, letting you change it out immediately. Additionally, Elsevier’s Your Paper your path program waves strict formatting demands for the first distribution of the manuscript so long as it contains all of the crucial elements being presented here.
Result in the guide list plus the citation that is in-text strictly into the design provided when you look at the Guide for Authors. Keep in mind that presentation associated with the sources within the format that is correct the duty associated with the writer, perhaps maybe not the editor. Checking the structure is generally a job that is large the editors. Make their work easier in addition they will appreciate your time and effort.
Finally, always always check the following:
- Spelling of writer names
- 12 months of magazines
- Usages of “et al.”
- Punctuation
- Whether all sources are included
During my next article, i am going to offer methods for composing the manuscript, authorship, and exactly how to create a compelling employment cover letter. Stay tuned!divider
Recommendations and Acknowledgements
I’ve based this paper in the materials distributed to your attendees of numerous courses. It really is encouraged by many people Guides for writers of Elsevier journals. A number of this given info is additionally showcased in Elsevier’s Publishing Connect tutorials. In addition, We have consulted a few webpages: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/, www.physics.ohio-state.edu/
I would like to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet, Executive Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, on her behalf constant help. And I also wish to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her help, this show might have been impractical to finish.
Related Tales
In this series that is new “How to get ready a Manuscript for Overseas Journals” — a practiced editor provides advice to improve your odds of acceptance
Students writes concerning the motivation behind their model for earthquake forecast – and exactly exactly exactly what he discovered on their (“tedious but well worth it”) journey to publication
Whatever they don’t constantly let you know before you register for graduate school
The research that is ideal you envision is certainly not what it looks
Journal editors expose the most notable reasons a manuscript gets posted
Tips for Authors through the Publishing Connect Training Webcasts Channel
A log editor reveals the most truly effective reasons many manuscripts don’t ensure it is to your peer review process